hd receiver picture quality

[nuku22]

does anyone know which hd receiver has the best picture quality at the moment (at least better than the humax hd receiver)?i need to buy one a.s.a.p and picture quality is very important to me or should i wait for the dreambox 800 although i remember the picture quality of the dreambox 7000s i had was apalling.
any advice would be much appreciated

[Dreamcatcher]

Bit of an open question M8 as most people will only own one. Try a few reviews to see if you can get an idea.

[kaja008]

As far as I know DM800 has a brilliant picture quality both in SD and HD.
Anyway Kathrein UFS 910 has the best picture quality out there.

[bobi]

Ipbox 9000 hd, Kathrein 910 usf hd, are almost the same in picture quality
Exellent quality in SD AND HD picture, MGcamd working good, usals ok,
will actualy give Ipbox 10 out of 10 and Kathrein 9 out of 10
my preference is Ipbox, but we all have our own mind and testing to make conclusions

Darkbox , exellent picture for so low cost receiver, brilian receiver
and very good picture both SD and HD.Support is briliant from Darkman and Diavolo
opens all channels that are hacked, has multicard reader reads all type of cards

Opti*** 7700 CICX HD , very very good picture quality,
is a bitt to slow in Unoficial support but there is all we need.

Vantage 7100 TS HD / <---- same as Hyro 9000 TS HD
very high picture quality, very good support from third part software makers
open all what is hacked, HDD support ( usb 500 gig tested) AVI files can be played
from HDD, MP3 ,has multicard reader reads all type of cards and much more.

for plug and play receiver i will say the
Vantage 7100 TS HD / <---- same as Hyro 9000 TS HD is my choise
for a bitt more complicated receiver Ipbox 9000 beats the hell out of all receivers i have tested untill now.

there are much more HD receivers out there, but this is what i have come accross so far
and tested , have not made any step by step test , but basicly all of this receivers are good for the budget and price diferences

cheers

bobi

[nuku22]

Ipbox 9000 hd, Kathrein 910 usf hd, are almost the same in picture quality
Exellent quality in SD AND HD picture, MGcamd working good, usals ok,
will actualy give Ipbox 10 out of 10 and Kathrein 9 out of 10
my preference is Ipbox, but we all have our own mind and testing to make conclusions

Darkbox , exellent picture for so low cost receiver, brilian receiver
and very good picture both SD and HD.Support is briliant from Darkman and Diavolo
opens all channels that are hacked, has multicard reader reads all type of cards

Opti*** 7700 CICX HD , very very good picture quality,
is a bitt to slow in Unoficial support but there is all we need.

Vantage 7100 TS HD / <---- same as Hyro 9000 TS HD
very high picture quality, very good support from third part software makers
open all what is hacked, HDD support ( usb 500 gig tested) AVI files can be played
from HDD, MP3 ,has multicard reader reads all type of cards and much more.

for plug and play receiver i will say the
Vantage 7100 TS HD / <---- same as Hyro 9000 TS HD is my choise
for a bitt more complicated receiver Ipbox 9000 beats the hell out of all receivers i have tested untill now.

there are much more HD receivers out there, but this is what i have come accross so far
and tested , have not made any step by step test , but basicly all of this receivers are good for the budget and price diferences

cheers

bobi

so which receiver has the best pq and would you recommend mate? or should i wait for the dm800

[nuku22]

As far as I know DM800 has a brilliant picture quality both in SD and HD.
Anyway Kathrein UFS 910 has the best picture quality out there.

have you seen dm800?

[crabber]

I have only had my 1080P Samsung for about a week and my Kathrein for a day, but I watched Man U on digi Alb HD1 this afternoon and it was the best (and only lol) I have seen.

[DARKMAN]

DARKBOX for moment ghas the best picture ...i try mostly all receivers in "Quality Picture.".

[bobi]

for the budget Darkbox is the best and most cheap.
also has so much support from Darkman, you will not go wrong there.

if you have some more money to spend then i will go for Ipbox

this is my experiments, and preferences for now,
Low on money = Darkbox
more money = Ipbox

Dreambox , well cannot addvise on that as that box stil have not seen the daylight:D ro much talk about it but no sales :D

cheers

bobi


so which receiver has the best pq and would you recommend mate? or should i wait for the dm800

[kaja008]

have you seen dm800?

No, but I heard it from a beta tester who has already one on hand.

[ozzsurf]

&#163;200 is that cheap

[Opus]

£200 is that cheap

199£ = 251€ or 395$

[ozzsurf]

yeah i know what the pound is against the euro/dollar
but peeps here keep saying the word cheap
&#163;200 is not cheap
cheapest

[Opus]

oh sorry then i misunderstood the question hehe.

indeed people should say the box is the cheapest of them all and not just cheap cause 251€ is not cheap at all.
its alot of money for most people.

[nuku22]

i have decided to order the katherein receiver.can someone direct me to where to find images,support etc

[crabber]

Send me a PM if you need any help.

[holmroad]

Surely the DM receiver with its packages (needed to make it work - lol!!) cost a lot more than an investment of £200 M8? Maybe just the stb yes, but without the software where WOULD you be?:D